30 December 2008

Quote of the day



An excerpt from the article "Why does Hollywood hate the suburbs?"


by: LEE SIEGEL



art: LEONARD KOSCIANSKI



The cultural chasm between liberals and conservatives that first appeared in the '60s was largely one between the city and the suburbs. The liberal "idealism" that had created the catastrophe in Vietnam now got blamed, unfairly or not, for failing economic and social policies. For marginalized conservatives, the suburbs were living refutation of the crumbling ethos that had guided the crime-ridden, decaying urban centers. For embattled liberals, people leaving the cities for safer and cleaner outlying towns were racists and cowards who had no respect for shared public space.

One of the most glaring ironies of American life is that, a quarter-century later, the cities have metamorphosed into the suburbs -- sans trees and grass. The cities' fabled diversity has devolved into global chain stores and the electrolyte-enhanced water bottle and the branded baseball cap have become the accessories of a universal comfort and conformity. In a social and cultural sea change, the cities' rented apartments, once the guarantor of diversity and fluid, exciting movement, have been converted into exclusive co-ops and condominiums. Yet as the cities have become a new type of suburb, suburb-phobia has become an ever more acceptable cultural attitude. The suburban person is considered too meek, too asphalt-challenged to inherit the earth. In the urban centers, on the other hand, desperate ambition makes bad manners respectable, and the chic of perverse taste covers up Philistine cluelessness. The decent, suburban person is regarded as contemptible because he has not learned to reach beyond his talents and pick life's pockets.

28 December 2008

Quote of the day

By "Reincarnate"
http://forums.fark.com/cgi/fark/comments.pl?IDLink=4108047&cpp=1
(In regard to an act of violence by a guy who was fed up about people talking in a movie theater)

The issue; our current legal system is not working. We've restricted areas that the 'bad' people don't care to follow. They've made it easy for people to make money off others by suing for any petty injustice. And they've made people overly aggressive, self-important and careless to the point of idiocy because they can benefit from nearly any circumstance.

But the point is simple; the law has made us both aggressive and pansies. Those that are 'evil-doers' just don't give a shiate. Those that are 'good-doers' are still arseholes because they think they have protection from the law and are emboldened by it, but at the end of the day, are scared off by real violence.

27 December 2008

Mini-review of the film 'Kill Switch'




Yes, go rent it already.



How could someone be a registered member of the Seagal forum and then just go off and call Kill Switch a bad movie? It was a blast. I loved Steven's "ghetto south" persona and accent. The directing/production was pretty cutting edge for the established limits of the film (don't think this was a theatrical release vice a home entertainment release). The story was entertaining and not just "pulp." Music, lighting, sets, acting, everything deserves a healthy critical eye, not a slam like "This movie was bad."




The best was the climax - the rock 'em sock 'em boss fight at the end - unnecessarily extreme and a atrociously joyous surprise. Justice is a dish served best with ball peen hammers. Noticed the film was done in Canada - has this been the norm lately?Thank you Steven & co. for another fantastic film.

19 December 2008

08 December 2008

The Neo Gettysburg Address


Is it sad to see an essay as profound as the Gettysburg Address distilled into a single PowerPoint slide?
I'm increasingly thinking that the m.o. for the modern generation is throw out deep knowledge and osmose concepts, which I believe is going to limit my capability to write anything paling in comparison to the passionate and elequent letters near the time of the American Civil War.
I'm doing my best to catch up on reading in one of my classes. In one volume, a historian lamented on the changes in understanding vs. merely processing information. As I was pressed for time due to all my assigned reading, I'm ironically thinking, "Get to the point!" Really the point was the old adage, "Those who do not study history are doomed to repeat it." Obviously. I wish I were a full-time student as I would be more inclined to osmose more.
With regard to making time for undertaking such things: I try not to make excuses when I miss an event. I now say, "I didn't make time to do 'x'," instead of "I didn't have time to do 'x'." The sheer symbolic enormity of having 60 books to read is a great figurative ammo box to mount my offensive against the procrastination of reading them.