Should a Hooters girl be allowed to speak to students at their school?

   Huge ripples in the internet yesterday on this question.  What's your opinion?  I say, "Yes, of course."



A now famous picture illustrating the concept between progressive feminist fantasy and reality.


   -The article in question: (LINK)

   -The best comments:

Great, a para-legal that THINKS she is a lawyer. Our economy, which is basically swirling around in the toilet, is being run in Washington by mostly lawyers. I would rather fire all of the lawyers, and para-legals, and put the Hooter's Girls in charge. I'm sure they could do a better job and certainly they will show more respect to the citizens of the USA. Unfortunately Ashley, you got your name in the SPTimes, which in this case is NOT a good thing. Because other parents will not agree with you, you have probably doomed
your son to ridicule. Good job.

Many a college student waited tables through college. Nothing wrong with learning customer service. keeping track of multiple tasks and team work.

   -The story of an amazing Hooters girl who made her way to Vice Presidency of the company: (LINK)

   -The quote by Dr. MLK, Jr.:
 
 

 
Fin.

Nice Dream

Nice Dream (Link)

I had a really great dream during a nap today.

Dreams so often blur the lines between sleep and reality.  That is, to say, they seem so real at the time.  They are real, as far as we know.

I've been thinking a bit lately about this man-hater, this slug named Kagan, who through no fault of her own, was awarded a spot as U.S. Solicitor General despite 31 senators voting negatively.  I know that positions awarded like this one tend to be political in nature, but what if someone truly objective (remember the blindfold on the lady justice came along?  Would both sides of the aisle come to an agreement in these modern United States?

Now, she's up for U.S. Supreme Court justice, which will be rammed through given the liberal balance of power in U.S. government, despite doubts on her morality; despite her lack of experience; despite her preposterous banning of military recruiting and ROTC at Harvard while working there.  A likely constitutional revisionist and relativist who can sit there and tinker around for a nice, loooooong time. 

I would refuse to go to Harvard, given the opportunity. Come to think of it, I'm glad we don't recruit there. The military has no room for those who lack humility and honor, the silver-spooned and vain.

In my nice dream, I had gone with my friend Rusty to a big Harvard gala.  Just as the festivities let out, we stole our way up scores of stairs to the roof of the student union, atop a large hill.  Then, turning around, the view of the town of Cambridge was quite breathtaking.  The stairs were made of white limestone, like you'd see outside the SCROTUS (Supreme Court).

And then, we urinated all over the streets of Harvard from our bird's eye view.  Not a trickle, but thousands of gallons flooding the area until you had something briefly resembling the waterways of Sicily. 

On the Greek financial crisis

Just dropping in to remind everyone that the U.S. financial crisis of 2009 and any ripple effects, to include Greece, are the result of modern liberalism from the Clinton years, and Reno the bank-slayer.  Care to disagree?  Please comment.

Brace yourselves for commie freako impact...

You've caught me in a grim mood, genteel reader.

My inbox this weekend had the makings of a big anti-American wallop in the works, a harbinger of unabashed iconoclasm well in the open:

1. Hate crimes statutes, a.k.a. thought crimes, (call them what they REALLY are) are percolating again. This screams against reason. Every crime is committed with a degree of hatred toward law and order. Why should there be double jeopardy for something done with an evil or at least untoward end in the first place? This threat stifles free speech, and sets a nihilistic snowball in motion toward 'everything's relative', 'if it feels good, do it.' No problem there - but anything counter to opening the floodgates in the spirit of said 60s mantra, then you're intolerant, and must defend against a label rather than advance with reason. A popular tactic of the scions of community organizing.

2. Jesus missing from speech: Why did The White House request the symbol representing Jesus be covered at the President's speech at Georgetown last week? At least The Sermon on the Mount was mentioned in the President's speech. Crickets.

3. Gov't vs. USMC: Look at the so-called Haditha massacre. Your troops are becoming scapegoated for doing their jobs and will need to henceforward second guess all of their battlefield decisions based on the fear of being prosecuted. Not a good situation to be in. May have been a similar instance with the SWAT vs. the evil CA parolee two weeks ago (the parolee killed 4 officers). I'm told the police followed restrictive ROE which made them less able to act, because heaven knows everytime a thug is killed, it's the fault of vindictive policemen. Lt Col Chesani has been absolved at least twice for any wrongdoing. How is it in the govt's best interest to spend this much time and resources trying to convict one of their own, and a war-hero?

4. Targeting right-wing speech: This exceptionally stupid report was another politically motivated attack on conservatism (see earlier post, 'Fusion Centers'). Napolitano, a former governor of the state of Arizona, could have done more, much more to stem the flow of invaders from south of the border during her tenure, but acted contrary to the wishes of her constituency based on personal politics - unethical and absurd. Now she's DHS? Good job.

5. Breaking news: (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,517137,00.html)

Excerpt:
Miss North Carolina Kristen Dalton was crowned Miss USA on Sunday, but the big story to come out of the normally politics-free telecast was Miss California's comments regarding gay marriage. When asked by judge Perez Hilton, an openly gay gossip blogger, whether she believed in gay marriage, Miss California, Carrie Prejean, said "We live in a land where you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite. And you know what, I think in my country, in my family, I think that I believe that a marriage should be between a man and a woman. No offense to anybody out there, but that's how I was raised." Keith Lewis, who runs the Miss California competition, tells FOXNews.com that he was "saddened" by Prejean's statement.

[End.]

So she was asked a loaded question by a pervert, responded in kind with her beliefs, and will probably be targeted by '1' and '4' above. I tell you what, friends: It's a race to the bottom. Any reasonable person should be outraged at the swirling cloud of anti-reason looming in. So brace yourselves. At least Miss U.S.A.'s standing up for normalcy, and maybe bought one more week for those of us that would like to speak out in public for the American way.

Quote of the day: 'Horsiness of the brazen tart'

Subject: Dr. Michael Savage on Laura Dern's Golden Globes acceptance speech. Colorful English is fun!

I wholeheartedly agree with Dr. Savage's recent disdain of the the modifier 'so' as in "Thank you 'soooo' much." I paraphrase:

"You ever hear that thing that's been going on the last two years, 'Thank you sooo much.' They throw that extra "so" in there. If you hear that, you better go for your Glock because you're about to be fleeced."

"It's horsiness of the brazen tart. No wonder so many men are becoming gay, listen to these women."



My take on the matter is that it's a pretty crappy vernacular trend. There is no shortage of pretense in this; imagine a cake made of 1/8" bread and 7/8" frosting. (Unfortunately, so may be my bombast.) However, for that matter, the common greeting "How are you?" is also a bit disingenuous, but resists rejection because it is firmly steeped in our language tradition.

I once knew a lady who threw in the 'so' at every opportunity. I wanted to ask her, "So - what do you say when you're TRULY grateful for something? This, because you already said 'so.'"



Never fear, the 'sooo' trend is on the way out.

As for "Horsiness of the brazen tart," this is a figurative jackpot. All three reels landed on beautiful underused words. What's going on within this sentence, exactly? Facial structure? What about 'brazen'? Does this refer to one accustomed to pretense? I presume 'tart' refers to the category of the lumped America-hating femmes in Hollywood, very few resist the sway of the cult of personality. How could you expect them to?

Visit Dr. Savage at http://www.michaelsavage.com/



Cagey out.

US bride sues over wilted bouquets: press

Can anyone imagine what the marriage would be like to a woman like this? What a piece of work.

It's also another reason why I would never be a lawyer.

US bride sues over wilted bouquets: press
Tue Oct 16, 12:38 PM ET
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20071016/od_afp/lifestyleuslegalmarriage;_ylt=AnSst4_LCyTf66.Hufwucw0uQE4F

NEW YORK (AFP) - Newlyweds in New York have filed a 400,000 dollar lawsuit against the florist who supplied the flowers for their wedding, saying they were the wrong color and wilted, press reports said Tuesday.

Among things that drew the ire of the bride, Elana Glatt, who also happens to be a lawyer, were the alleged inclusion of cheaper orchids than promised in the bridal bouquet, the New York Times reported.

"The use of predominantly pastel centerpieces had a significant impact on the look of the room and was entirely inconsistent with the vision the plaintiffs had bargained for," the Times quoted the lawsuit as saying.